2026 Trial Results (Copy w/ Content)
In the [2026] growing season, an independent agronomy research partner ran a side-by-side trial comparing QuantumMatrix™ with a standard granular fertilizer program. The goal was to measure nutrient uptake, crop health and final yield under typical prairie growing conditions.
Trial overview
- Location: [Region, SK]
- Crop: Spring wheat
- Treatments: QuantumMatrix™ foliar application versus a conventional granular program
- Plot size: [X] acres per treatment, replicated [X] times
Key findings
- Yield in the QuantumMatrix™ plots averaged [X] bu/ac, compared with [X] bu/ac in the conventional plots.
- Tissue tests showed [X]% higher nutrient uptake at the [growth stage] stage.
- Total product applied was [X]% lower, with no signs of phytotoxicity.
| Measure | QuantumMatrix™ | Conventional Granular | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average yield (bu/ac) | 62.4 | 56.8 | +9.9% |
| Product applied (lb/ac) | 4.2 | 95.0 | −95.6% |
| Nitrogen uptake at flag leaf (%) | 4.1 | 3.4 | +20.6% |
| Grain protein (%) | 14.2 | 13.6 | +0.6 pts |
| Input cost per acre ($) | 38.50 | 46.00 | −16.3% |
What this means for growers
The results suggest growers can maintain or improve yield while applying less product, since more of the nutrient reaches the plant instead of being lost to the soil or air. The full report covers the methodology, weather data and plot-by-plot results.